|
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
Allergic Reactions to Latex Gloves I. Introduction and Background A. Federal Agencies Recognize a Health Problem The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has proposed amendments (expected to be ratified in the next few months) to its medical device regulations to address the burgeoning incidence of latex allergies amongst healthcare workers and their patients. The regulations will require specific labeling of all medical devices (including gloves) containing natural rubber latex (NRL) that may directly or indirectly contact human tissue. The regulations pertain to gloves classified as "medical gloves," gloves used by surgeons or for patient examination. While the issue of FDA labeling compliance is not necessarily a concern for lab workers, these employees are nonetheless at risk of allergic response to latex gloves. Whether classified as "nonmedical, utility, industrial, protective, or general purpose" gloves outside of the FDA's purview, latex gloves are a potential hazard to any worker who must wear them on a regular basis. Be aware that the FDA interpretation of "medical" gloves is not based on the wearer's/consumer's end use of the gloves (e.g., in a lab, cleaning your house, as a food server) but on the vendor's classification of the gloves as such. For example, if the gloves are advertised as medical gloves in the manufacturer's or distributor's supply catalogue, then they are officially medical gloves and you should be able to find a label to warn you of latex composition. For those lab workers who must contend with latex allergy, this notice is beneficial because you have prior purchasing information available to allow you to reject given, possibly irritating brands. In conjunction with the FDA's Notice of a Proposed Rule, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) issued an "Alert" entitled "Preventing Allergic Reactions to Natural Rubber Latex in the Workplace." See the NIOSH Home Page (http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/) for the text of this document. Much of the information in this ORS bulletin was taken from the "Alert." B. History There has been a dramatic increase in the occurrence of serious types of reactions to latex since the late 1980s. Estimates of incidence vary widely. The literature reports that anywhere from 5 to 15% of hospital workers suffer from this affliction. One to 6% of the general population experience this condition. Specific incidence rates for lab workers are not available but studies have shown that 11% of nonhealthcare workers exposed to latex at their jobs will also manifest symptoms of the allergy. Those healthcare professionals following the rising trend attribute the increase in disease prevalence to two major factors.
A. Natural vs. Synthetic Latex: Clarification of the Terminology Natural rubber latex (NRL) is a milky fluid derived from the Hevea brasiliensis tropical rubber tree. The raw agricultural material can be processed by two different methods.
Synthetic latex is an emulsion of synthetic rubbers and plastics to which natural rubber latex may or may not be added. As pertains to latex allergy, a glove that contains any natural rubber latex may cause a reaction. Synthetic gloves are only truly "synthetic" when they include NO NRL or dry rubber in their formulations. B. Hypoallergenic Gloves Gloves described as "hypoallergenic" latex gloves do NOT reduce the risk of latex allergy. The adjective "hypoallergenic" refers to reduced quantities of chemical additives in the latex. These gloves may alleviate irritant reactions (from chemical sensitivity) but not "true" latex allergy. This term is based on results of the modified (human) Draize test which is not effective for predicting individual susceptibility to protein allergy. III. Symptoms of Latex Allergy There are three types of reactions to latex gloves.
The health consequences of exposure can be significant for those workers allergic to latex. Some individuals become so sensitive that they can no longer use any latex-containing products or be present in an environment where latex particles are present in the air. The IgE-mediated sensitivities may cause life-threatening reactions in some victims. For those individuals afflicted with hypersensitivity, the routes of exposure go beyond skin contact. IgE-mediated reactions may additionally occur from exposure to mucosa (e.g., nasal cavity, genitourinary tract), parenteral invasion (intravenous, subcutaneous, intramuscular--as during surgery), and by inhalation. The threshold amount of protein and extent of latex exposure time that activates a sensitization or allergic reaction are unknown. The risk of progression from skin rash to more serious reactions is also unknown. The proteins associated with latex allergies adhere to the powder used in some gloves. When powdered gloves are worn, more latex protein reaches the skin. The removal of gloves can release protein/powder particles into the air, where they can be inhaled or come into contact with mucosa. Atopic individuals (i.e., those persons with a tendency to have numerous allergies) are predisposed to this ailment. Latex allergy is particularly associated with allergies to certain foods, especially avocados, potatoes, bananas, tomatoes, chestnuts, kiwi fruit, and papaya. Persons with congenital defects of the spine, primarily spina bifida, are at increased risk of latex allergy, probably due to the multiple operations (and, thus, exposures to latex) they must endure. VI. Recommendations For Prevention The only effective treatment for a worker who has been sensitized to latex is avoidance. Exposure to the allergenic proteins must be reduced for the victim to maintain a healthy state. Certain medications may reduce allergy symptoms but relief is minimal. Avoidance, while certainly difficult and often impractical, is absolutely the best approach to protecting the afflicted person. Latex allergy can be prevented if employees are spared undue exposures to latex. The following steps illustrate feasible approaches to protecting reaction-prone workers.
Major glove supply companies such as Ansell-Edmont and Best Manufacturing are devoting significant resources to reducing the latex protein allergen content of their latex glove product lines. This research grew out of earlier work to remove chemical residues (irritating accelerators and antioxidants) from gloves. The same solutions used before have potential for application in achieving the new goal. Leaching is a process used to extract excess chemicals and has been shown to be successful in removing protein allergens as well. This procedure offers hope for eventual widespread control of the stimuli that initiate latex allergy.
The American Latex Allergy Association offers latex-free alternatives when you click on "Latex Alternatives." Information about glove suppliers can be found under Medical Products. At present, there are no data available concerning the differences between permeation rates and breakthrough times of NRL and synthetic gloves. It has been a long-held industry assumption (correct or not?) that NRL provides superior protection against infectious agents due to its tear resistance, elasticity, and tactile sensory characteristics. That belief cannot be supported concretely at this time. Ansell Healthcare Division. Recognizing the Problem, Facing the Challenges. Ansell Healthcare Division (1997). Food and Drug Administration. Latex-containing Devices; User Labeling. Federal Register, Vol. 61, 122 (June 24, 1996). Halsey, John F. "IH Has Valuable Role in Latex Allergy Dilemma." The Synergist (AIHA, June/July 1997): 51-52. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSH ALERT: Preventing Allergic Reactions to Natural Rubber Latex in the Workplace. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-135 (June, 1997). -------. NIOSH ALERT on Work-Related Latex Allergy Recommends Steps to Reduce Exposures. HHS Press Release (June, 1997). |
|||||||||||||
|
Internal ORS Links: What's New | Emergency Response | Administration | Biological Safety | Chemical Safety | Hazard Communication | Laboratory Safety | New to NU? | Radiation Safety External ORS Links: Northwestern Home | Vice President for Research | Big 10 EH&S Links | Risk Management | Employee Safety Handbook ORS - Evanston 2145 Sheridan Road Tech NG71
Evanston, IL 60208 |